The game's highest preset, 'Badass', is a tough one - so it's not a surprise to see the 3060 slip to an average of less than 30fps at 4K. Borderlands 3įrom id Tech we move to an Unreal Engine 4 title, Borderlands 3. Please enable JavaScript to use our comparison tools. Doom Eternal: Vulkan, Ultra Nightmare, 8x TSSAA
Ns 3060 takenote 1080p#
Interestingly, after trailing at higher resolutions, the RTX 2070 Super takes back its lead at 1080p - an interesting trend we'll have to keep an eye on as we progress. At 1080p, you can expect frame-rates in excess of 220fps, so if you're a competitively-minded person then even the RTX 3060 is enough to take advantage of a 240Hz monitor - as long as you have a strong CPU too. That's a bit higher than even the RTX 2070 Super and almost exactly what the RX 5700 XT scored in the same test. That's at 4K, but what about lower resolutions that are more likely to be paired with the 3060? Even dropping to 2560x1440 allows for a healthy average of 159fps, more than enough to take good advantage of a 144Hz monitor. It's more or less tied with the RTX 2070 Super, a $500 graphics card, so at a retail price of $329 you're getting a pretty impressive value here - if this trend continues, anyway. Still, compared to last-gen hardware, the 3060 still performs expertly. The RTX 3060 Ti is 26 per cent faster than the 3060 here, while the RTX 3070 is 44 per cent faster. For a game released in the 20s, the new Doom requires very little graphics horsepower to achieve outstanding results, and even on mainstream hardware you're able to hit high frame-rates, high resolutions or both.Įven at 4K, which is far from the RTX 3060's expected wheelhouse, the game still renders our test scene at a comfortable 80fps on average. We start with the go-to game for making any graphics hardware look good: Doom Eternal. All the data here is derived from video captured directly from each GPU, ensuring an accurate replay of real performance. Below the real-time metrics is a bar chart, which you can mouse over to see different measurements and click to switch between actual frame-rates and percentage differences. Play the video, and you'll see exactly how each card handled the scene as it progresses. On a desktop-class browser, you'll get the full-fat DF experience with embedded YouTube videos of each test scene and live performance metrics. On mobile, you'll get a basic overview, with metadata from the video capture of each GPU being translated into simple bar charts with average frame-rate and lowest one per cent measurements for easy comparisons.
Our benchmark results are presented a little differently to what you might be used to elsewhere on the web.
Ns 3060 takenote full#
If you're gaming on an ultra-wide, you can expect 2560x1080 screens to require slightly more graphics horsepower than you'd need for a 16:9 Full HD display, while the more common 3440x1440 resolution is almost exactly between 1440p and 4K. We've run our benchmarks at the standard three resolutions: 1080p, 1440p and 4K. That should help lessen CPU bottlenecking at lower resolutions. Each of the four games in this section are modern titles using advanced graphics APIs, like DirectX 12 and Vulkan, which are able to make better use of high core count processors - like the Core i9 10900K in our test rig. Let's start with the games that we call the super-performers, the ones that we saw the biggest generation on generation improvements when we first started testing RTX 30-series graphics cards.
0 kommentar(er)
